| An over-the-counter stock
market is a network of brokers and dealers that trade stocks and
bonds that are not listed on an Exchange. Sometimes companies prefer
to be listed on an OTC market instead of listing on a stock exchange.
Over-the-Counter market is a stock exchange where securities transactions
are made via internet and telephone than on the floor of an exchange.
In Over-the-Counter (OTC) markets, an investor who
wants to sell an asset must search for a buyer, incurring opportunity
or other costs. When two counterparties meet, their bilateral relationship
is strategic. Prices are set through a bargaining process that reflects
each investor’s alternatives to immediate trade. The buyer,
in particular, considers the costs that he or she will eventually
incur when he or she wants to sell, and so on for all future owners.
We build a dynamic asset-pricing model that captures these features.
Under natural conditions, prices are higher if investors can find
each other more easily, if sellers have more bargaining power, or
if the fraction of qualified owners is greater. If agents face risk
limits, then higher volatility leads to greater difficulty locating
unconstrained buyers, resulting in lower prices. Information can
fail to be revealed through trading when search is difficult.
The OTC market has a big role to play in the primary
market. Many new stock issues are sold over-the-counter initially.
Large block of outstanding shares offered for a sale by a single
investor, whether listed on an exchange or not, are sometimes sold
in the OTC stock market. The disclosure standards for the OTC market
are not as stringent as those imposed by a stock exchange. Corporations
whose shares are listed on an exchange are generally not allowed
to list or trade on the OTC market and vice versa.
Even in the most liquid OTC markets, the relatively
small price effects arising from search frictions receive significant
attention by economists. An over-the-counter market considered to
be a benchmark for high liquidity, is subject to widely noted illiquidity
effects that differentiate the yields of on-the-run (latest-issue)
securities from those of off-the-run securities. Positions in on-the-run
securities are normally available in large amounts from relatively
easily found traders such as hedge funds and government-bond dealers.
Financial decision makers often consider the forward-looking
information in currency option valuations when making assessments
about future developments in foreign exchange rates. The OTC quotes
include volatilities, strangles and risk-reversals on the dollar,
yen and pound per euro as well as on yen per dollar. In addition
to volatility forecasts we evaluate option based interval and density
forecasts which are widely used by practitioners but which have
not been systematically assessed so far. OTC options are quoted
daily with fixed money in contrast with market-traded options which
have fixed strike prices and thus time varying money as the spot
price changes. Finally, the trading volume in OTC options is often
much larger than in the corresponding market traded contracts which
in turn is likely to render the OTC quotes more reliable for information
extraction.
The market for OTC derivatives has expanded steadily
and rapidly over the past two decades. According to Bank for International
Settlements (BIS), the vast majority of OTC derivatives are interest
rate and foreign exchange contracts; equity-related contracts make
up only 2 percent of the market, while tangible commodities account
for a fraction of a percent.
Activity in OTC derivatives markets has been primarily
concentrated in three types of instruments: swap agreements, options
and hybrid instruments. The typical swap agreement is a contract
between two parties providing for the exchange of cash flows based
on differences or changes in the value or level of one or more interest
rates, currencies, commodities, securities, or other asset categories.
These cash flows are calculated with reference to a principal base
(known as the “notional amount”) of the underlying asset
category. Because the notional amount of a swap agreement is only
a contractual term used to calculate the amount of payments under
the swap agreement, it generally is not exchanged between the parties
to the agreement. Accordingly, the notional amount is not a measure
of the value or the risk in a swap agreement.
As OTC markets develop, however, the extent to
which market participants engage in large numbers of transactions
with similar terms increases, because certain instruments serve
the risk-management needs of a large number of market participants.
Thus, the opportunity to negotiate the terms and conditions of an
instrument may exist, but in practice this opportunity may not be
used to a great extent for certain types of instruments. Moreover
the widespread use of innovations such as electronic online trading
and clearing have the potential to increase efficiency and reduce
systemic risk, they could also blur some of the distinctions between
exchange-traded and OTC instruments.
- - - - - - - - - - - end of
page - - - - - - - - - - - |